1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP) has 192 more horse power than 2006 Subaru Forester. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2006 Subaru Forester.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Subaru Forester. (225 Nm). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Thunderbird | Forester |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 225 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 60 L |