1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (583 HP) has 375 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 947 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (721 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (410 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Holden Belmont | 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Belmont | E |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5025 cc | 7255 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 583 HP |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 721 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 2302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2600 mm |
