1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | 240 | Eos |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |