1969 Riley Kestrel vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Riley Kestrel | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Riley | Holden |
Model | Kestrel | Colorado |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |