1969 Zastava 850 K vs. 2011 Ford E-250
To start off, 2011 Ford E-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1555 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Zastava 850 K | 2011 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Zastava | Ford |
| Model | 850 K | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 846 cc | 4600 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 2410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 2154 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3505 mm |
