1970 Chrysler 160 vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (105 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1970 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1970 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 1970 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (136 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1995 Mazda MX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Chrysler 160 | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 136 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |