1971 BMW 2002 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 BMW 2002. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 2002 | 1995 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2002 | Astro |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2830 mm |
