1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1971 BMW 2002. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1971 BMW 2002.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (352 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 2002 | HHR |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4483 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1588 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2629 mm |