1971 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200. (75 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200. (126 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1971 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda Cosmo | 1995 Mercedes-Benz 200 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Cosmo | 200 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2810 mm |
