1971 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-2 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
