1971 Zastava 1300 vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300.
Because 1971 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Zastava 1300 | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Zastava | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2007 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2490 mm |
