1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1951 BMW 340
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1951 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1951 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 BMW 340 weights approximately 69 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1951 BMW 340 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 2200 | 340 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |