1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 1983 Skoda L is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 356 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Austin | Skoda |
| Model | 2200 | L |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 38 L |
