1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 1978 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1978 Lancia Beta is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Lancia Beta (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Lancia Beta (165 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1978 Lancia Beta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 1978 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | 160 | Beta |
Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 165 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2310 mm |