1972 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Avenger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Avenger (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 160 | Avenger |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1496 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2766 mm |