1972 Citroen SM vs. 1959 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1959 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1959 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Zodiac. (188 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Citroen SM | 1959 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | SM | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2668 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 76 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.9 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2720 mm |
