1972 DAF 66 vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 66 | MX |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2760 mm |