1972 Dodge Charger vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Charger (256 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Charger (470 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 1972 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Charger | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Dodge | Citroen |
Model | Charger | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6555 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 470 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 110.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |