1972 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1972 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (141 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 551 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Mustang | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1972 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2290 mm |