1972 Mazda 616 vs. 2009 Renault Logan
To start off, 2009 Renault Logan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2009 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Logan weights approximately 155 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 616 | 2009 Renault Logan | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 616 | Logan |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2640 mm |