1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 2003 Seat Cordoba is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Seat Cordoba. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Seat Cordoba. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Cordoba weights approximately 144 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Seat Cordoba. (112 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Seat Cordoba.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Seat Cordoba | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | Cosmo | Cordoba |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1198 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |