1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Murano weights approximately 504 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Murano (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Cosmo | Murano |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3498 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |