1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia Optima (197 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia Optima weights approximately 512 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia Optima (252 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | Cosmo | Optima |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1454 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2795 mm |