1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. (120 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 280 kg more than 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Jensen | Lotus |
Model | Jensen-Healey | Evora |
Year Released | 1973 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |