1973 Volvo 1800 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 1800 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1973 Volvo 1800. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1973 Volvo 1800.
Because 1973 Volvo 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Volvo 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Volvo 1800. (154 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Volvo 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Volvo 1800 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | 1800 | Epica |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 154 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |