1974 Lotus Eclat vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1974 Lotus Eclat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 57 kg more than 1974 Lotus Eclat. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (190 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat. 2008 Nissan Rogue has automatic transmission and 1974 Lotus Eclat has manual transmission. 1974 Lotus Eclat will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Nissan Rogue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Lotus Eclat | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Eclat | Rogue |
Year Released | 1974 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 60 L |