1974 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2009 Toyota Corolla

To start off, 2009 Toyota Corolla is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Corolla (124 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3.

Because 1974 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Corolla (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.

Compare all specifications:

1974 Mazda RX-3 2009 Toyota Corolla
Make Mazda Toyota
Model RX-3 Corolla
Year Released 1974 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1962 cc 1997 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 135 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4090 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2320 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 55 L