1974 Volvo 140 vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP) has 390 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Volvo 140 | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | 140 | GT-R |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 485 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 588 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2779 mm |