1975 Volvo 66 vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (171 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1975 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1975 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Volvo 66 | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Volvo | Suzuki |
| Model | 66 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
