1975 Zastava 132 vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1975 Zastava 132 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Zastava 132 (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Zastava 132 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Zastava 132 (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1975 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Zastava 132 | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Zastava | ZAZ |
Model | 132 | 966 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1756 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2170 mm |