1975 Zastava 132 vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Zastava 132 (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Zastava 132 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Zastava 132 | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Zastava | ZAZ |
| Model | 132 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1756 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2330 mm |
