1997 Renault Helem vs. 1975 Zastava 132
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 403 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 555 kg more than 1975 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Zastava 132 (142 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1975 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Renault Helem | 1975 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Helem | 132 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 510 HP | 107 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1095 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
