1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 371 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 160 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
