1976 Mazda 616 vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda 616 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 616 | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 616 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1820 mm |