1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1956 Wartburg 311
To start off, 1976 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1956 Wartburg 311. (37 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1956 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 130 kg more than 1956 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Wartburg 311. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda Cosmo | 1956 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
Model | Cosmo | 311 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2460 mm |