1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Kangoo (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-2 | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-2 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |