1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G (207 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RX-2 | G |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4686 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2850 mm |