1977 Austin Allegro vs. 1974 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1977 Austin Allegro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph Stag (143 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1977 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1977 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph Stag weights approximately 350 kg more than 1977 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Austin Allegro | 1974 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Allegro | Stag |
Year Released | 1977 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |