1977 Lotus Eclat vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1986 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 170 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1977 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Lotus Eclat | 1986 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Eclat | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1977 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2420 mm |