1978 AMC Pacer vs. 1961 Jaguar MK IX

To start off, 1978 AMC Pacer is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.

Because 1961 Jaguar MK IX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar MK IX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1978 AMC Pacer 1961 Jaguar MK IX
Make AMC Jaguar
Model Pacer MK IX
Year Released 1978 1961
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4228 cc 3779 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 220 HP
Engine Bore Size 95.3 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.1 mm 106 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2900 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]