1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird

To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 627 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Chrysler 160 2004 Ford Thunderbird
Make Chrysler Ford
Model 160 Thunderbird
Year Released 1978 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 3933 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 89 HP 280 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 133 Nm 388 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1085 kg 1712 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2490 mm