1979 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia weights approximately 748 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia has automatic transmission and 1979 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1979 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Austin Allegro | 2001 Chevrolet Sabia | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Allegro | Sabia |
Year Released | 1979 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |