1979 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S40 weights approximately 648 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1979 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | S40 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2650 mm |
