1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2008 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Subaru Outback is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1363 kg more than 2008 Subaru Outback.
Because 2008 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2008 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Subaru |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Outback |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2748 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 64 L |
