1979 Subaru Rex vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 658 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Subaru R2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (45 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1979 Subaru Rex. (29 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Subaru Rex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1979 Subaru Rex. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Subaru Rex. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru R2 (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Subaru Rex. (42 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru R2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Subaru Rex | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Subaru | Subaru |
Model | Rex | R2 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 543 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1930 mm | 2370 mm |