1980 Alfa Romeo 179 vs. 2012 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2012 GMC Yukon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 GMC Yukon (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1473 kg more than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Yukon (454 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179. (177 Nm). This means 2012 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Alfa Romeo 179.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Alfa Romeo 179 | 2012 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | GMC |
| Model | 179 | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2573 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 117 L |
