1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 44 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Mini Metro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Mini Metro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mini Metro | Minica |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2350 mm |
