1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero (163 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 786 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Mini Metro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Mini Metro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mini Metro | Pajero |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 17.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 88 L |