1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,759 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Torana weights approximately 270 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Holden Torana has automatic transmission and 1980 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Holden Torana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 1972 Holden Torana | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Holden |
| Model | A 112 | Torana |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1759 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2440 mm |
