1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (238 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 37 kg more than 1996 Ford Taurus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | El Camino | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 238 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2760 mm |
